By Michael Dirda
From Pulitzer Prize-winning e-book critic Michael Dirda comes a set of his such a lot own and fascinating essays at the literary life—the ideal spouse for any lover of books.
Michael Dirda has been hailed as "the best-read individual in America" (The Paris Review) and "the most sensible e-book critic in America" (The ny Observer). as well as the Pulitzer Prize he was once offered for his experiences in The Washington Post, he picked up an Edgar from the secret Writers of the US for his most up-to-date ebook, On Conan Doyle.
Dirda's most modern quantity collects fifty of his witty and wide-ranging reflections on literary journalism, booklet amassing, and the writers he loves. achieving from the classics to the post-moderns, his allusions dance from Samuel Johnson, Ralph Waldo Emerson and M. F. ok. Fisher to Marilynne Robinson, Hunter S. Thompson, and David Foster Wallace. Dirda's subject matters are both varied: literary pets, the misplaced artwork of cursive writing, booklet inscriptions, the pleasures of technological know-how fiction conventions, writer photos, novelists in outdated age, Oberlin university, a 12 months in Marseille, writer's block, and masses extra, to not omit a number of rants approximately Washington lifestyles and American tradition. As admirers of his prior books will count on, there are annotated lists galore—of ideal e-book titles, nice event novels, favourite phrases, crucial books approximately books, and liked children's classics, in addition to a revealing peek on the titles Michael retains on his personal nightstand.
Funny and erudite, sometimes poignant or indignant, Browsings is a party of the analyzing existence, a fan's notes, and the best reward for any booklover.
Read or Download Browsings: A Year of Reading, Collecting, and Living with Books PDF
Best literary criticism books
Bloom's glossy serious perspectives
Das wilde Leben und die impulsive, rebellische Literatur der Beat-Generation glichen nicht selten einer Höllenfahrt. Hans-Christian Kirsch porträtiert die Leitfiguren der literarischen Untergrundbewegung der 50er und 60er Jahre in den united states und setzt der Beat-Literatur mit liebevoller, aber keineswegs unkritischer und bisweilen ironischer Reverenz ein sehr persönliches Denkmal.
Poète préféré des Français, Arthur Rimbaud est aussi l'un de ceux sur lesquels on a le plus écrit. On ne compte plus les livres, brochures, articles qui ont été consacrés depuis los angeles finn du XIXe siècle à cet " esprit impétueux ", selon los angeles formule de son ami Paul Verlaine.
William Logan has been a thorn within the facet of yankee poetry for greater than 3 a long time. although he has been known as the “most hated guy in American poetry,” his witty and articulate studies have reminded us how muscular sturdy reviewing could be.
These new essays and reports take poetry at its note, usually discovering in its toughest instances the best purposes for wish. Logan starts off with a witty polemic opposed to the desire to have critics announce their aesthetics whenever they start a evaluate. “The insufferable Rightness of Criticism” is a plea to learn these critics who obtained it fallacious after they reviewed Lyrical Ballads or Leaves of Grass or The Waste Land. occasionally, he argues, such critics observed precisely what those books were—they observed the poems undeniable, but usually didn't see that they have been poems.
In such wrongheaded feedback, readers can recuperate the floor damaged by way of such groundbreaking books. Logan appears back on the poetry of Wallace Stevens, Frank O’Hara, and Philip Larkin; on the letters of T. S. Eliot, Elizabeth Bishop, and Robert Lowell; and at new books by way of Louise Glück and Seamus Heaney.
Always desirous to overturn settled judgments, Logan argues that international battle II poets have been in spite of everything greater than the much-lauded poets of global conflict I.
He revisits the secretly revised version of Robert Frost’s notebooks, exhibiting that the negative mistakes ruining the 1st version nonetheless exist. the main awesome essay is “Elizabeth Bishop at summer time Camp,” which prints for the 1st time her early adolescent verse, in addition to the intimate letters written to the 1st woman she enjoyed.
- Roberto Bolaño's Fiction: An Expanding Universe
- Conversations with William Maxwell
- Aliens: The Anthropology of Science Fiction (Alternatives)
- Poet's Thinking: Pope, Whitman, Dickinson, Yeats
- Soul and Form (Columbia Themes in Philosophy, Social Criticism, and the Arts)
- Forty-One False Starts: Essays on Artists and Writers
Extra resources for Browsings: A Year of Reading, Collecting, and Living with Books
MacKinnon, for example, argues convincingly against the liberal distinction between violence and sex in rape and pornography, a distinction that, in addition to denying what should be the obvious fact that violence is sex for the rapist, has helped to make pornography sound merely sexy, and therefore to protect it. If she and Dworkin use the word violence to describe pornography that would normally be classified as nonviolent (for example, porno films with no explicit sado-masochism or scenes of rape), it is because they define as violent the power relation that they see inscribed in the sex acts pornography represents.
There is, for example, a gay and lesbian history of which many of us were not aware until recent studies brought aspects of that history to our attention. Part of this history brings to light more or less underground gay communities in Europe and the United States before the Unpublished lecture given in London, 1996. i s t h e r e a g ay a r t ? | 32 modern period, communities in which we see rudimentary forms of what we would call a gay or lesbian culture. I will pass over for the moment the relation of this field of studies to the claim that the homosexual did not exist as a person—that there was only same-sex behavior—before he or she was invented in the mid-nineteenth century, a claim that might be thought of as erasing a whole area of gay studies.
The ancient Greek model, as both Foucault and David Halperin describe it, made for a brutal reduction of the person to his sexual behavior: phallic penetration of another’s body not only expressed virility but also was a sign of social superiority, an expression of something we might call the (male) citizen-essence. This binary model is a striking example of the misogyny inherent in homophobia, even though it was not opposed to homosexuality per se. In a sense, the Greeks were so open about their revulsion to what they understood as female sexuality, and so untroubled in their thinking about the relation between power and phallic penetration, that they didn’t need to pretend, as nineteenth-century sexologists did, that men who went to bed with other men were all secretly women.