By Katherine Munn, Barry Smith
Ontology is the philosophical self-discipline that goals to appreciate how issues on the planet are divided into different types and the way those different types are comparable. this is often precisely what details scientists goal for in developing established, automatic representations, known as ontologies, for coping with details in fields such as technology, executive, undefined, and healthcare. at the moment, those structures are designed in a number of other ways, so they can not proportion info with each other. This quantity exhibits, in a non-technical approach and utilizing examples from drugs and biology, how the rigorous software of theories and insights from philosophical ontology can enhance the ontologies upon which info administration relies.
Read Online or Download Applied Ontology PDF
Similar consciousness & thought books
Raymond Martin's publication is an immense contribution to the philosophical literature at the nature of the self, own id, and survival. Its exact method is person who is phenomenologically descriptive instead of metaphysical and normative. this is often the 1st booklet of analytic philosophy at once at the phenomenology of identification and survival.
Helena Michie's provocative new paintings seems at how women's our bodies are portrayed in a number of Victorian literary and non-literary genres--from portray, poems, and novels, to etiquette, books, intercourse manuals, and pornography. After deciding on a sequence of codes and taboos that govern the depiction of girls in such actions as consuming and dealing, she then turns to the actual descriptions of Victorian heroines, targeting these components in their our bodies which are erased, and on those who turn into fetishized in traditional description.
The subject of private id has brought on a number of the liveliest and finest debates in fresh philosophy. In a desirable new contribution to the dialogue, Peter Unger offers a psychologically aimed, yet bodily established, account of our identification through the years. whereas assisting the account, he explains why many influential modern philosophers have underrated the significance of actual continuity to our survival, casting a brand new mild at the paintings of Lewis, Nagel, Nozick, Parfit, Perry, Shoemaker, and others.
Technological know-how and its philosophical spouse, Naturalism, symbolize truth in completely nonpersonal phrases. How, if in any respect, can a nonpersonal scheme accommodate the first-person point of view that all of us take pleasure in? during this quantity, Lynne Rudder Baker explores that question through contemplating either reductive and eliminative ways to the first-person point of view.
- Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing
- An utterly dark spot : gaze and body in early modern philosophy
- Knowledge and the Transcendent: An Inquiry into the Mind's Relationship to God
- A study of Hegel's logic
- Free Will, Agency, and Selfhood in Indian Philosophy
- Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World: The McDowell-Dreyfus Debate
Extra info for Applied Ontology
One instrument for improving communication is the OBO Foundry’s Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA) Ontology, developed through the Department of Biological Structure at the University of Washington in Seattle, which is a standard-setter among bioinformation systems. The FMA represents the structural composition of the human body from the macromolecular level to the macroscopic level, and provides a robust and consistent schema for the classification of anatomical unities based upon explicit definitions.
3. Matter and Form According to Aristotle General is the opposite of regional, and formal is the opposite of material. Formal ontology, rather than being non-regional, is non-material. It may study a specific kind of thing, but that does not mean that it studies particular and concrete instances of these kinds. What does this mean? In order to distinguish formal from material ontology, we will now consider the distinction between matter and form. There are at least two different traditional conceptions of the difference between matter and form, which are attributable to Aristotle and Immanuel Kant respectively.
A biological kind, however, is by no means the same as the set of its instances. For, while the identity of a set is dependent upon its elements or members and, hence, participates to some degree in the world of time and change, sets themselves exist outside of time. By contrast, biological kinds exist in time, and they continue to exist even when the entirety of their instances changes. Thus, biological kinds have certain attributes in common with individuals (Hull, 1976, 174-191; Ghiselin, 1997), and this is an aspect of their ontology which has been given too little attention in bioinformatics.