By Yevgeny M. Primakov, Henry A. Kissinger

During this candid and sobering account, former Russian leading Yevgeny M. Primakov considers the threats posed via self sufficient terrorist businesses to overseas defense. in accordance with his personal vast event and contacts within the center East - the place he served for years as a journalist earlier than his political occupation - he additionally examines the jobs of the Israeli-Palestinian clash and extremist Islam in investment terrorism. because the assaults of September eleven made transparent, the process overseas affairs is not any longer formed solely through co-operation and war of words between countries. but, the way in which states reply to terrorism - together with America's struggle on terror - may have a profound impression at the constitution of the overseas method. In Primakov's view, potent and co-ordinated responses to terrorism can restrict its effect. even if, he, argues, a unilateral American method of the matter of overseas terrorism can make such co-operation tough. during this context, Primakov explains Russian matters in regards to the US conflict in Iraq - and divulges new info of his ultimate own try to convince Saddam Hussein to step down. Primakov urges Russia and the U.S. to hitch forces extra quite simply to percentage details and intelligence approximately rising terrorist threats. extra greatly, he writes, if the USA is ready to paintings inside of a "multi-polar world", Russia could be a precise and dependable associate. nonetheless, if the USA attempts to head it on my own, it might probably face the implications in isolation.

Show description

Read Online or Download A World Challenged: Fighting Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century PDF

Best russian & former soviet union books

On the Edge: Ukrainian-Central European-Russian Security - download pdf or read online

With the break-up of Russia, a brand new globally major courting is the most subject of this quantity, specifically the geopolitical hyperlink among Russia, Ukraine and the 3 bordering `Central eu' states, being Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. "On the sting" offers research of this triangular courting with specialise in fiscal, political and extra importantly, safety matters.

Alexandra Ashbourne's Lithuania: The Rebirth of a Nation, 1991-1994 PDF

In 1990, the tiny Soviet Republic of Lithuania declared independence and started restoring the mechanisms of self sustaining executive and democracy that have been suppressed via its Soviet invaders for part a century. Lithuania examines the 1st years of this rebirth within the face of the legacy of the Soviet career.

Download PDF by Reginald E. Zelnik: Law and disorder on the Narova River: the Kreenholm strike

Reginald Zelnik makes use of a unmarried episode--a militant strike on the Kreenholm manufacturing facility, Europe's biggest fabric plant--to discover the large ancient second. In analyzing this significant occasion of Russian background he sheds clean mild on neighborhood strength kinfolk, excessive politics in St. Petersburg, controversies over the rule of thumb of legislation, and the origins of the Russian hard work circulation.

Extra info for A World Challenged: Fighting Terrorism in the Twenty-First Century

Sample text

5 On a visit to the United States, after meeting with Secretary of State George Shultz on August 27, 1982, Sharon made the following statement: “Israel never has and never will agree to a second Palestinian state. . There already is a Palestinian state. ”6 It could be surmised that Sharon has supported and always will support resolving the question of Palestine with an updated Allon plan (named for Yigal Allon, Israeli foreign affairs minister in 1974–77). The Allon plan proposed that Israeli troops be stationed in a fifteen-kilometer zone along the Jordan River’s West Bank (Israel’s military border) and in several other locations.

This formula was called land for peace. S. Approach The formula of land for peace is widely recognized as the key to a Middle East settlement, yet it has not succeeded. Partly at fault is the mentality of the parties involved in the bloody struggle over the past century. S. approach. First, the United States refused to put Arab-Israeli peace efforts above all else. Second, the United States virtually excluded the USSR, and later Russia, from actively participating in the peace process. The United States monopolized the peace process, but did not devote its full attention to promoting a comprehensive peace solution for the two sides.

But change was slow in coming. Even more important, the treaty’s separate peace provided a strong alternative to more comprehensive peace efforts. But the treaty itself contained no directives to continue the progress toward peace. ” The treaty signed at Camp David dragged out the resolution of the Palestinian problem and did nothing to end the fighting and armed conflict. ”4 There were no substantial changes in the Middle East peace process for twenty years after the signing of the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.38 of 5 – based on 36 votes